Jody Hice
Key Voting Record
Key Vote Description
Legislator Score / Vote
2018: 115th Congress 82%
- 1: On Agreeing to the Amendment: Amash Amendment (USA RIGHTS Act) to S. 139✔ Yea
Key Vote 1: On Agreeing to the Amendment: Amash Amendment (USA RIGHTS Act) to S. 139
The USA RIGHTS Act would prohibit the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) from querying information gathered through Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) without obtaining a warrant. It would also provide narrow exceptions, such as the case of life-threatening emergencies or if the target has consented to a query followed by a warrant. The amendment codifies the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court’s (FISC) ban on “abouts” collection. The National Security Agency (NSA) was forced to end “abouts” collection after the FISC determined that it was inconsistent with the Fourth Amendment. Additionally, the USA RIGHTS Act, sponsored as an amendment to S. 139 as an amendment by Rep. Justin Amash (R-Mich.), would prohibit reverse targeting, the collection of domestic communications, and the use of information obtained through Section 702 in criminal and civil court cases. It also brings a number of other important reforms to strengthen the oversight of the FISC and promote transparency.
"Yea" votes scored. Double Score - 2: On Passage: FISA Amendments Reauthorization Act, S. 139✘ Yea
Key Vote 2: On Passage: FISA Amendments Reauthorization Act, S. 139
Despite some tweaks to the original text produced by the House Select Committee on Intelligence, the FISA Amendments Reauthorization Act continues to represent an assault on the Fourth Amendment. The Bill of Rights is a cornerstone of our constitutional republic, and crucial to defending the civil liberties of all American citizens. FISA has caused damage to the Fourth Amendment for years, and now is a critical time to support genuine reform, such as the USA RIGHTS Act. The revised version of the FISA Amendments Reauthorization Act remains the exact opposite of reform, and it is worse than current law. The bill would continue the backdoor search, with an utterly meaningless “warrant requirement.” The caveats proposed to this purported “warrant requirement” are an end-run around the Fourth Amendment. The bill provides a path for the National Security Agency (NSA) to restart the practice of “abouts” collection. This means if a U.S. person mentions a potential surveillance target in a communication, the NSA can collect it, regardless of whether or not the U.S. person was communicating with anyone associated with the target. When the NSA was forced to end “abouts” collection, a judge on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) wrote that the practice raised “a very serious Fourth Amendment issue.” The judge also criticized the NSA for “an institutional lack of candor” for failing to disclose rule violations.
"Nay" votes scored. Double Score - 3: DeSantis-Budd Letter Urging a Public Vote to Reinstate Earmarks✔ Yea
Key Vote 3: DeSantis-Budd Letter Urging a Public Vote to Reinstate Earmarks
Reps. Ron DeSantis (R-Fla.) and Ted Budd (R-N.C.) have spearheaded a letter that urges House Republican leaders to hold a public vote to reinstate earmarks, should the House Republican Conference move forward on the tone-deaf notion of reinstating earmarks. Put simply, there must be a public and transparent process, including a recorded vote. The American public has a right to know which members are voting to reopen the favor factory by bringing back this currency of corruption. (Signers updated as of February 14, 2018.)
"Yea" votes scored. - 4: On Motion to Concur: Bipartisan Budget Act, H.R. 1892✔ Nay
Key Vote 4: On Motion to Concur: Bipartisan Budget Act, H.R. 1892
The Schumer-McConnell spending deal, the Bipartisan Budget Act, is the worst-case scenario for fiscal conservatives under a Democratic president and Democrat-controlled Congress, but it is happening under a Republican president and Republican Congress. This is reckless spending, and a massive tax hike on future generations, made under the guise of “bipartisan negotiations.” This is deceitful, aggressive overspending by those elected to protect taxpayers. Leaving Americans with higher budget deficits likely over $1 trillion, and a national debt that will balloon to over $21 trillion, is no way to govern, and its weight falls squarely on the shoulders of taxpayers. This deal makes clear that Republicans only care about deficits and out-of-control federal spending under a Democratic president. With a Republican president and Republican control of the House and Senate, there is no other conclusion that one can possibly draw.
"Nay" votes scored. Triple Score - 5: On Agreeing to the Amendment: Walters Amendment to H.R. 1865✔ Nay
Key Vote 5: On Agreeing to the Amendment: Walters Amendment to H.R. 1865
The Walters amendment would establish that Section 230 of the CDA does not impair or limit actions taken against internet service providers for sex trafficking cases in which an internet service provider “knowingly assist[s], support[s], or facilitat[es]” a violation of sex trafficking laws. For something that sounds reasonable, it is quite the opposite. The inclusion of an overbroad “knowledge” standard has been abused again and again in other areas, such as copyright law, and will undoubtedly be abused in this case. Even if passed, there is strong reason to believe that the law would be ineffective, and even counterproductive. The abusable “knowledge” standard actually will actually have the opposite of its intended effect -- disincentivizing those already working proactively to monitor content online to stop sex trafficking, by opening up their practices to legal liabilities.
"Nay" votes scored. - 6: On Passage: Trickett Wendler, Frank Mongiello, Jordan McLinn, and Matthew Bellina Right to Try Act, H.R. 5247✔ Yea
Key Vote 6: On Passage: Trickett Wendler, Frank Mongiello, Jordan McLinn, and Matthew Bellina Right to Try Act, H.R. 5247
Key Vote:The Trickett Wendler, Frank Mongiello, Jordan McLinn, and Matthew Bellina Right to Try Act amends federal law that currently prohibits the production and prescription of potentially lifesaving drugs that have already cleared the initial phase of the FDA’s approval process to allow certain patients with a terminal illness or a life-threatening condition access to these drugs. It also provides protection for manufacturers and prescribers from liability.
Bill:The Trickett Wendler, Frank Mongiello, Jordan McLinn, and Matthew Bellina Right to Try Act amends federal law that currently prohibits the production and prescription of potentially lifesaving drugs that have already cleared the initial phase of the FDA’s approval process to allow certain patients with a terminal illness or a life-threatening condition access to these drugs. It also provides protection for manufacturers and prescribers from liability.
"Yea" votes scored. - 7: On Motion to Concur in the Senate Amendment with an Amendment: Consolidated Appropriations Act, H.R. 1625✔ Nay
Key Vote 7: On Motion to Concur in the Senate Amendment with an Amendment: Consolidated Appropriations Act, H.R. 1625
Process aside, the spending levels appropriated in the bill are nothing short of fiscally disastrous. In February, Congress passed the Bipartisan Budget Act, H.R. 1892. This two-year budget agreement blew through the spending caps by nearly four times more than the 2013 two-year budget deal and nearly five times more than the 2015 two-year budget deal. This omnibus is an extension of the Bipartisan Budget Act. It appropriates discretionary spending at $1.291 trillion – $700 billion for defense and $591 billion for nondefense – which is $143 billion above the spending levels, or caps, established by the Budget Control Act for discretionary spending levels.
"Nay" votes scored. - No votes for this year match the provided filters.
- View scorecard »
2017: 115th Congress 94%
- 1: On Passage: REINS Act - H.R. 26✔ Yea
Key Vote 1: On Passage: REINS Act - H.R. 26
Introduced by Rep. Doug Collins (R-Ga.), the Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny (REINS) Act requires congressional approval for economically significant rules promulgated by federal regulatory agencies. Rules defined as economically significant have an annual impact of $100 million or more. The Obama administration finalized more than 600 economically significant rules in less than eight years. The REINS Act brings a crucial check on executive power, reduces the influence of federal regulatory agencies, and begins to reclaim Congress’ constitutional power as the sole lawmaking authority under the Constitution.
"Yea" votes scored. - 2: On Passage: Regulatory Accountability Act - H.R. 5✔ Yea
Key Vote 2: On Passage: Regulatory Accountability Act - H.R. 5
Introduced by Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), the Regulatory Accountability Act seeks to reform the regulatory process, making it more transparent for the American people and more accountable to Congress. It also includes language to reverse the Chevron deference, which has been used by regulatory agencies to enact law without judicial review.
"Yea" votes scored. - 3: On Passage: H.J. Res 41 - Resolution of Disapproval Against the SEC's Disclosure of Payments by Resource Extraction Issuers Rule✔ Yea
Key Vote 3: On Passage: H.J. Res 41 - Resolution of Disapproval Against the SEC's Disclosure of Payments by Resource Extraction Issuers Rule
This resolution of disapproval of the Congressional Review Act nullifies the Securities and Exchange Commission's Disclosure of Payments by Resource Extraction Issuers rule. Promulgated under the authority of the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, or Dodd-Frank, this rule requires resource extraction issuers to include in annual reports the payment of any entity controlled by the regulated business to foreign governments or the United States government "for the purpose of the commercial development of oil, natural gas, or minerals." The Securities and Exchange Commission projects initial compliance costs between $239 million and $700 million and annual compliance costs between $96 million and $591 million.
"Yea" votes scored. - 4: On Passage: H.J.Res. 38 - Resolution of Disapproval Against the Department of the Interior's Stream Protection Rule✔ Yea
Key Vote 4: On Passage: H.J.Res. 38 - Resolution of Disapproval Against the Department of the Interior's Stream Protection Rule
This resolution of disapproval of the Congressional Review Act nullifies the Department of the Interior's Stream Protection Rule. With an annual estimated cost of $81 million, according to the Department of the Interior's Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, the Stream Protection Rule is another blow to the coal industry, which was a favorite target of the Obama administration. The National Mining Association estimates that rule will lead to billions of dollars in lost revenues to state and local governments, as well as the loss of between 113,000 and 280,000 jobs.
"Yea" votes scored. - 5: On Passage: H.J. Res. 37 - Resolution of Disapproval Against the DOD, GSA, and NASA Federal Acquisition Regulation✔ Yea
Key Vote 5: On Passage: H.J. Res. 37 - Resolution of Disapproval Against the DOD, GSA, and NASA Federal Acquisition Regulation
This resolution of disapproval under the Congressional Review Act nullifies a the Department of Defense, the General Services Administration, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's relating to the Federal Acquisition Regulation. This regulation requires federal contractors to disclose decisions on the reporting of violations of federal labor laws and creates paycheck transparency protections for employees of federal contractors. The rule is expected to cost employers $458.3 million in the first year, $413.7 million in the second year, and between $398.5 million and $400 million annually thereafter.
"Yea" votes scored. - 6: On Passage: H.J.Res. 36 - Resolution of Disapproval Against the Bureau of Land Management’s Prevention, Production Subject to Royalties, and Resource Conservation Rule✔ Yea
Key Vote 6: On Passage: H.J.Res. 36 - Resolution of Disapproval Against the Bureau of Land Management’s Prevention, Production Subject to Royalties, and Resource Conservation Rule
This resolution of disapproval of the Congressional Review Act nullifies Bureau of Land Management’s Prevention, Production Subject to Royalties, and Resource Conservation Rule. With annual compliance costs between $114 million and $279 million, the so-called “venting and flaring” rule purports to reduce waste from “reduce the waste of natural gas from mineral leases administered” by the Bureau of Land Management. In reality, the purpose of the rule is to discourage oil and gas production on land overseen by the agency. The Bureau of Land Management estimates annual compliance costs between $114 million and $279 million.
"Yea" votes scored. - 7: On Passage: H.J.Res. 57 - Resolution of Disapproval Against the Department of Education's Accountability and State Plans Rule✔ Yea
Key Vote 7: On Passage: H.J.Res. 57 - Resolution of Disapproval Against the Department of Education's Accountability and State Plans Rule
This resolution of disapproval under the Congressional Review Act, which gives Congress authority to effectively nullify regulations submitted for review by federal agencies within 60 legislative days, would cancel the Department of Education’s Accountability and State Plans Rule. The Department of Education’s Accountability and State Plans Rule implements part of the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) and leaves open a loophole that federal bureaucrats could exploit to force Common Core on states that haven't implemented the standards. Education officials from several states and local jurisdictions strongly opposed the rule when it was being crafted.
"Yea" votes scored. - 8: On Passage: H.R. 372 - Competitive Health Insurance Reform Act ✔ Yea
Key Vote 8: On Passage: H.R. 372 - Competitive Health Insurance Reform Act
Introduced by Rep. Paul Gosar (R-Ariz.), the Competitive Health Insurance Reform Act would eliminate the antitrust exemption the health insurance industry currently has under the McCarran-Ferguson Act of 1945. One of the main problems with the health care system today is the protections put in place by the federal government that cater to special interest groups. The Competitive Health Insurance Reform Act promotes the free market and competition by changing a law put in place nearly 70 years ago to reflect the current market we have today. It would also ensure that the health insurance industry complies with the same laws other businesses do.
"Yea" votes scored. - 9: On Passage: H.R. 1101 - Small Business Health Fairness Act ✔ Yea
Key Vote 9: On Passage: H.R. 1101 - Small Business Health Fairness Act
The Small Business Health Fairness Act, H.R. 1101, sponsored by Rep. Sam Johnson (R-Texas), would allow small businesses to join together through association health plans (AHPs) to provide employees with more affordable health insurance coverage. ObamaCare has caused the cost of health insurance coverage to rise, making it difficult for small businesses to continue offering health insurance coverage to employees. The Small Business Health Fairness Act would help level the playing field for small businesses, which don’t have the negotiating power of larger firms and exemptions under Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), and lower administrative costs related to health insurance.
"Yea" votes scored. - 10: On Passage: Consolidated Appropriations Act - H.R. 244✔ Nay
Key Vote 10: On Passage: Consolidated Appropriations Act - H.R. 244
The process for the Consolidated Appropriations Act, which funds the federal government for the remainder of FY 2017, could not have been worse. This massive, nearly 1,700-page spending measure was negotiated behind closed doors between congressional leadership from both chambers and appropriators. With a Republican-controlled Congress and a Republican president, this spending bill reflects Obama-era spending levels. The bill annualizes base discretionary spending for FY 2017 at $1.07 trillion. This spending level blows through the spending caps established by the Budget Control Act of 2011 by $30 billion. The bill spends an additional $106 billion for overseas contingency operations, disaster relief, and other spending, which isn’t counted toward the spending caps. In total, the bill authorizes more than $1.175 trillion in annualized discretionary spending for FY 2017. The bill also falls short of promoting conservative priorities. While the bill does renew the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program and does not include funding for ObamaCare’s cost-sharing subsidies, it allocates nearly $296 million to bail out Puerto Rico’s Medicaid program, preserves current spending levels for the Environmental Protection Agency, increases spending for the National Institutes of Health and the National Endowment for the Arts, and provides a bailout for a private sector labor union.
"Nay" votes scored. Double Score - 11: On Passage: Probation Officer Protection Act - H.R. 1039✘ Yea
Key Vote 11: On Passage: Probation Officer Protection Act - H.R. 1039
While there is a need to protect law enforcement officers who are performing their duties, the Probation Officer Protection Act is an answer in search of a problem. Interference with a federal probation officer is already unlawful and current law already allows a law enforcement officer to arrest an individual or individuals who obstruct a federal probation officer during the performance of their duties. The instances in which third parties obstruct a federal probation officer are rare. While probationers have lost some of their Fourth Amendment rights, third parties have not. The Probation Officer Protection Act could lead to instances in which the Fourth Amendments rights of third parties are infringed because of overly broad language in Section 2(b) or interpretations of words in it, such as “intimidation” or “interference.” Additionally, the “rules and regulations” under which the arrest authority of federal probation officers will be determined by the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, not by Congress. This creates yet another situation in which Congress is relenting its constitutional authority to another branch of the federal government.
"Nay" votes scored. - 12: On Passage: Financial CHOICE Act - H.R. 10✔ Yea
Key Vote 12: On Passage: Financial CHOICE Act - H.R. 10
The Financial CHOICE Act would eliminate the job-killing regulations that Dodd-Frank has instituted, rein in the CFPB, increase penalties for financial institutions who engage in illicit practices, and provide other reforms necessary to address the issues that earlier “well intentioned” legislation instituted. While we are disappointed and frustrated that language in the bill that would have repealed the Durbin amendment was removed by the House Rules Committee, if passed, the Financial CHOICE Act will open up the market in the financial sector that would help create jobs and invite new businesses. This will drive compliance costs down, increase the number of banks that will be created, and provide the necessary oversight to the federal government.
"Yea" votes scored. - 13: On Agreeing to the Amendment: McClintock Amendment to H.R. 2810✘ Nay
Key Vote 13: On Agreeing to the Amendment: McClintock Amendment to H.R. 2810
Sponsored by Rep. Tom McClintock (R-Calif,), the amendment would strike the proposed prohibition against another round of Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC). A 2013 report by the conservative American Enterprise Institute (AEI) estimated that the first four rounds of BRAC save approximately $8 billion annually. The 2005 BRAC is saving nearly $4 billion annually.
"Yea" votes scored. - 14: On Agreeing to the Amendment: Gosar Amendment to H.R. 2810✔ Yea
Key Vote 14: On Agreeing to the Amendment: Gosar Amendment to H.R. 2810
Sponsored by Rep. Paul Gosar (R-Ariz.), the amendment would require that Secretary of Labor conduct determinations for the prevailing wage for defense-related construction projects. Currently, the Department of Labor's Wage and Hour Division uses survey data that is unreliable and inflates the prevailing wage. The amendment would lower the cost of defense-related construction projects, saving taxpayers money.
"Yea" votes scored. - 15: On Passage: H.J.Res. 111 - Resolution of Disapproval Against the CFPB's Arbitration Rule✔ Yea
Key Vote 15: On Passage: H.J.Res. 111 - Resolution of Disapproval Against the CFPB's Arbitration Rule
This resolution of disapproval under the Congressional Review Act (CRA) would cancel the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (CFPB) arbitration rule. The CFPB’s arbitration rule is a giveaway to trial lawyers. The rule ostensibly bans contractual arbitration clauses related to consumer financial products offered by banks and other financial sector firms. This severely limits consumers’ ability to enter into arbitration during disputes. Trbitration is an easier and quicker process for consumers to resolve issues, but lawyers don’t make much money from this process. The rule, however, will encourage trial lawyers to pursue more class-action lawsuits, which take longer and result in smaller payouts to consumers.
"Yea" votes scored. - 16: On Agreeing to the Amendment: Griffith Amendment to H.R. 3219✔ Yea
Key Vote 16: On Agreeing to the Amendment: Griffith Amendment to H.R. 3219
Sponsored by Rep. Morgan Griffith (R-Va.), this amendment would eliminate the CBO’s Budget Analysis Division. The amendment transfers the authority of the division to the Director of the CBO.
"Yea" votes scored. - 17: On Agreeing to the Amendment: Blackburn Amendment to H.R. 3219✔ Yea
Key Vote 17: On Agreeing to the Amendment: Blackburn Amendment to H.R. 3219
Sponsored by Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), this amendment would make a 1 percent across the board rescission to Division D of H.R. 3219 – the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act.
"Yea" votes scored. - 18: Discharge Petition for H.Res. 458 - 2015-Style ObamaCare Repeal✔ Yea
Key Vote 18: Discharge Petition for H.Res. 458 - 2015-Style ObamaCare Repeal
For the better part of a decade, congressional Republicans pledged to repeal ObamaCare. Between 2011 and 2015, the House passed legislation to fully repeal ObamaCare on four separate occasions before eventually using reconciliation for partial repeal. Roughly 18 months ago, the House passed the Restoring Americans' Healthcare Freedom Reconciliation Act, H.R. 3762, with only three Republican defections. The bill repealed as much of ObamaCare as possible under the rules of reconciliation, including the tax and cost sharing subsidies, Medicaid expansion, and the taxes that came with the law. The bill would have reduced the federal budget deficit by $516 billion over ten years. House Republicans must continue to work diligently to repeal ObamaCare. With the American health insurance system facing so many problems because of ObamaCare – among which are skyrocketing premiums and fewer choices in the non-group market – Republicans can’t give up. A discharge petition is a legislative tool that requires the signatures of 218 members of the House to immediately bring a bill to the floor for a vote.
"Yea" votes scored. - 19: On Agreeing to the Amendment: McClintock Amendment to H.R. 3354✔ Yea
Key Vote 19: On Agreeing to the Amendment: McClintock Amendment to H.R. 3354
Sponsored by Rep. Tom McClintock (R-Calif.), this amendment would reduce funding for the Essential Air Service program by $150 million and transfer the savings to the Spending Reduction Account. The Essential Air Service subsidizes flights to small communities in the United States and its territories. These flights, however, are often half full or mostly empty, within driving distance, and heavily subsidized.
"Yea" votes scored. - 20: On Agreeing to the Amendment: Budd Amendment to H.R. 3354✔ Yea
Key Vote 20: On Agreeing to the Amendment: Budd Amendment to H.R. 3354
Sponsored by Rep. Ted Budd (R-N.C.), this amendment would eliminate a planned $900 million earmark for an upgrade of an Amtrak rail line between Newark, New Jersey and New York City. Supposedly, the House has a moratorium on earmarks. Yet, this would be one of the largest ever included in an appropriations package. This amendment would redirect $474 million to deficit reduction and $400 million to New Starts Account.
"Yea" votes scored. - 21: On Agreeing to the Amendment: Brooks Amendment to H.R. 3354✔ Yea
Key Vote 21: On Agreeing to the Amendment: Brooks Amendment to H.R. 3354
Sponsored by Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.), this amendment would defund Amtrak, a federally funded passenger railroad service. Amtrak routinely loses money, failing to cover its operating costs through fares paid by passengers. This amendment would save $1.1 billion.
"Yea" votes scored. - 22: On Agreeing to the Amendment: Biggs Amendment to H.R. 3354✔ Yea
Key Vote 22: On Agreeing to the Amendment: Biggs Amendment to H.R. 3354
Sponsored by Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.), this amendment would cut funding for the Environmental Protection Administration’s (EPA) Environmental Programs and Management Account by $10.234 million and redirect the savings to the EPA’s Spending Reduction Account.
"Yea" votes scored. - 23: On Motion to Concur to the Senate Amendment to H.R. 601 - To Increase the Debt Limit✔ Nay
Key Vote 23: On Motion to Concur to the Senate Amendment to H.R. 601 - To Increase the Debt Limit
As amended by the Senate, H.R. 601 would increase the debt limit and fund the federal government through December 8 without any spending or regulatory reforms. There are no guarantees that the situation will be any different when Congress revisits the issue in December. We have reached a critical point. At a time when grassroots conservative engagement is essential to pass priorities like fundamental tax reform, the administration and a Republican-controlled Congress are playing right into the hands of leftists like Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi. A debt limit increase without any spending or regulatory reforms would only further anger grassroots conservatives, risking their support for other priorities.
"Nay" votes scored. - 24: On Agreeing to the Amendment: Blackburn Amendment to Division A of H.R. 3354✔ Yea
Key Vote 24: On Agreeing to the Amendment: Blackburn Amendment to Division A of H.R. 3354
Sponsored by Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), this amendment would make a 1 percent across the board rescission to Division A, which authorizes appropriations for Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies.
"Yea" votes scored. - 25: On Agreeing to the Amendment: Norman Amendment to H.R. 3354✔ Yea
Key Vote 25: On Agreeing to the Amendment: Norman Amendment to H.R. 3354
Sponsored by Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.), this amendment would reduce the appropriation to the EPA for FY 2018 by $1.869 billion.
"Yea" votes scored. - 26: On Agreeing to the Amendment: Grothman Amendment to H.R. 3354✔ Yea
Key Vote 26: On Agreeing to the Amendment: Grothman Amendment to H.R. 3354
Sponsored by Rep. Glenn Grothman (R-Wis.), this amendment would reduce the funding for the National Labor Relations Board (NRLB) by $99 million and transfer the savings to the Spending Reduction Account.
"Yea" votes scored. - 27: On Agreeing to the Amendment: Blackburn Amendment to Division F of H.R. 3354✔ Yea
Key Vote 27: On Agreeing to the Amendment: Blackburn Amendment to Division F of H.R. 3354
Sponsored by Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), this amendment would make a 1 percent across the board rescission to Division F, which authorizes appropriations for the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies.
"Yea" votes scored. - 28: On Agreeing to the Amendment: McClintock Amendment to H.Con.Res. 71 - FY 2018 Budget Resolution✔ Yea
Key Vote 28: On Agreeing to the Amendment: McClintock Amendment to H.Con.Res. 71 - FY 2018 Budget Resolution
The Republican Study Committee’s (RSC) FY 2018 budget, introduced as an amendment by Rep. Tom McClintock (R-Calif.), would reduce federal spending by more than $10 trillion over the ten-year budget window, bringing the budget into balance in FY 2023. The RSC’s budget would repeal ObamaCare and enact other patient-centered health insurance reforms, make Social Security and Medicare solvent, and reform federal welfare programs. It also promotes free trade, regulatory reform, and other free market, limited government principles. The current text of H.Con.Res. 71 and the McClintock amendment include language that allows the House Ways and Means Committee to produce legislation to reform the tax code. Riddled with loopholes and special interest deductions, America’s tax code has become far too complex. According to the Tax Foundation, Americans spent 8.9 billion hours and $409 billion complying with the more than 74,000-page tax code.
"Yea" votes scored. - 29: On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree: $36.5 Billion of Disaster Relief Funding Without Spending Offsets✔ Nay
Key Vote 29: On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree: $36.5 Billion of Disaster Relief Funding Without Spending Offsets
Key Vote:No one disagrees with the need for assistance for areas recently impacted by disasters. Nevertheless, the concern with the Additional Supplement Appropriations for Disaster Relief Requirements Act is that Congress is spending money without any spending offsets. In fact, the manner by which the bill will be brought to the House floor for consideration prohibits amendments that could offset the $36.5 billion appropriated. Currently, the national debt is $20.4 trillion. According to the Congressional Budget Office, the projected budget deficit for FY 2017 and FY is $804 billion and $855 billion, respectively. Congress is only a few years away from the $1+ trillion deficits that Republicans frequently and rightly criticized under President Barack Obama. Long-term projections are even more ominous from a budgetary perspective. Sadly, Congress is once again avoiding difficult choices at the expense of future generations.
Bill:The Trickett Wendler, Frank Mongiello, Jordan McLinn, and Matthew Bellina Right to Try Act amends federal law that currently prohibits the production and prescription of potentially lifesaving drugs that have already cleared the initial phase of the FDA’s approval process to allow certain patients with a terminal illness or a life-threatening condition access to these drugs. It also provides protection for manufacturers and prescribers from liability.
"Nay" votes scored. - 30: On Motion to Concur in the Senate Amendment to H.Con.Res. 71: FY 2018 Budget Resolution✔ Yea
Key Vote 30: On Motion to Concur in the Senate Amendment to H.Con.Res. 71: FY 2018 Budget Resolution
The budget resolution contains reconciliation instructions that allow the House Ways and Means Committee to produce legislation for fundamental tax reform. It has been more than 30 years since Congress passed fundamental tax reform. Since that time, the tax code has become riddled with carve-outs that benefit politically connected special interests. Today, there are more than 74,000 pages in the tax code. According to the Tax Foundation, Americans spent 8.9 billion hours and $409 billion on tax compliance in 2016. Congress has a generational opportunity to reform the tax code by consolidating and lowering tax rates, broadening the tax base, and promoting job creation and international competitiveness for American businesses. This will make the tax code fairer and simplify the filing process, allowing the vast majority of Americans to file their taxes on a postcard.
"Yea" votes scored. - 31: On Agreeing to the Conference Report: Tax Cuts and Jobs Act✔ Yea
Key Vote 31: On Agreeing to the Conference Report: Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
Key Vote:The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act lowers individual rates for the vast majority of taxpayers. In addition, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act nearly doubles the standard deduction, meaning Americans keep more of their hard-earned money, and doubles the child tax credit from $1,000 to $2,000. This bill also provides relief by doubling the exemption amount from the unfair death tax. Pass-through business owners, who file their taxes on their individual tax return, will be able to take a 20 percent deduction. This lowers the tax burden currently faced by pass-through businesses, which, according to the Tax Foundation, employ 70 million people, and promotes fairness. America’s business community will also see added growth as a result of the policy changes in this bill. The corporate tax rate will be lowered substantially from 35 percent to 21 percent, making American businesses more globally competitive and allowing them the resources they need to innovate and create jobs. It also eliminates confusion and complexity so job creators can focus on building their company and hiring working Americans. This bill also repeals the harmful ObamaCare individual mandate, a coercive tax on Americans. It’s estimated that 80 percent of households subject to this tax earn less than $50,000 per year. This is an unnecessary hardship being placed on working Americans. The federal government should not punish individuals who cannot afford ObamaCare’s costly health insurance plans or decide it is not the best course for them.
Bill:The Trickett Wendler, Frank Mongiello, Jordan McLinn, and Matthew Bellina Right to Try Act amends federal law that currently prohibits the production and prescription of potentially lifesaving drugs that have already cleared the initial phase of the FDA’s approval process to allow certain patients with a terminal illness or a life-threatening condition access to these drugs. It also provides protection for manufacturers and prescribers from liability.
"Yea" votes scored. - 32: On Passage: $81 Billion of Disaster Relief Funding Without Spending Offsets✔ Nay
Key Vote 32: On Passage: $81 Billion of Disaster Relief Funding Without Spending Offsets
Key Vote:House Republicans have long championed fiscal responsibility and opposed deficit spending. Unfortunately, this measure runs contrary to both of those promises, and would have devastating effects to our economy. Additionally, there is little accountability to ensure that the funds appropriated will be effectively used. The bill provides a staggering $81 billion dollars for disaster relief with absolutely no offsetting cuts in other areas. This is the largest request for a single disaster relief package in United States history. Congress must make corresponding, necessary cuts to ensure that if this relief package is necessary, our economy is not adversely impacted as a result. In addition, this amount of money is excessive and wasteful. It is nearly double the $44 billion that the White House initially requested. It is also substantially larger than each of the standalone disaster relief packages that were passed after Hurricanes Katrina and Sandy, $60 billion and $50.6 billion, respectively. This is not to mention that this new disaster relief bill comes in addition to the $52 billion already spent this year on Hurricanes Irma, Maria, and on wildfire relief.
Bill:The Trickett Wendler, Frank Mongiello, Jordan McLinn, and Matthew Bellina Right to Try Act amends federal law that currently prohibits the production and prescription of potentially lifesaving drugs that have already cleared the initial phase of the FDA’s approval process to allow certain patients with a terminal illness or a life-threatening condition access to these drugs. It also provides protection for manufacturers and prescribers from liability.
"Nay" votes scored. Double Score - No votes for this year match the provided filters.
- View scorecard »
2016: 114th Congress 100%
- 1: On Motion to Concur in the Senate Amendment: H.R. 3762 - Restoring Americans' Healthcare Freedom Reconciliation Act of 2015✔ Yea
Key Vote 1: On Motion to Concur in the Senate Amendment: H.R. 3762 - Restoring Americans' Healthcare Freedom Reconciliation Act of 2015
This bill uses the budget procedure known as "reconciliation" to repeal most of ObamaCare. The greater portion of ObamaCare's worst portions are included in this repeal bill, including its many new taxes, the unconstitutional individual and employer mandates, the expansion of Medicaid, and the insurance premium subsidies. Passing this bill laid out the blueprint for how Congress would achieve full repeal once President Obama leaves the White House.
"Yea" votes scored. Triple Score - 2: Override of the President's Veto of the Restoring Americans' Healthcare Freedom Reconciliation Act ✔ Yea
Key Vote 2: Override of the President's Veto of the Restoring Americans' Healthcare Freedom Reconciliation Act
This vote was to override President Barack Obama's veto of the Restoring Americans' Healthcare Freedom Reconciliation Act, which would have repealed ObamaCare through reconciliation.
"Yea" votes scored. Triple Score - 3: On Passage: H.R. 2017 - Common Sense Nutrition Disclosure Act of 2015✔ Yea
Key Vote 3: On Passage: H.R. 2017 - Common Sense Nutrition Disclosure Act of 2015
The Common Sense Nutrition Disclosure Act relaxed FDA regulations that required business owners who own 20 or more restaurants to provide calorie information on their menus. This is costly one-size-fits-all regulation, made possible by ObamaCare, that will cost business owners $1 billion.
"Yea" votes scored. - 4: On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass: H.R. 699 - Email Privacy Act✔ Yea
Key Vote 4: On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass: H.R. 699 - Email Privacy Act
The Email Privacy Act would amend the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 (ECPA) to protect the privacy of email communications by requiring a warrant to access emails and other covered electronic communications by American citizens that are in the custody of a service provider and more than 180 days old. H.R. 699 passed the House Judiciary Committee by a unanimous vote. This legislation is an important step in protecting the Fourth Amendment rights of Americans against unreasonable searches and seizures and updating our laws for the 21st Century.
"Yea" votes scored. - 5: On Passage: H.R. 5053 - Preventing IRS Abuse and Protecting Free Speech Act✔ Yea
Key Vote 5: On Passage: H.R. 5053 - Preventing IRS Abuse and Protecting Free Speech Act
This legislation is an important step in protecting the First Amendment rights of Americans against harassment and coercion from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Introduced by Rep. Peter Roskam (R-Ill.), this bill stops the IRS from collecting and releasing information about donors to tax-exempt organizations, which would chill political speech. The legislation would protect the free speech of donors to nonprofit organizations by modifying IRS disclosure requirements of information such as donor names and addresses. Under H.R. 5053, tax-exempt organizations are required to report only information on donors who contribute $5,000 or more and who are either an officer of the organization or one of its five highest paid employees.
"Yea" votes scored. - 6: On Agreeing to the Amendment: Sanford Amendment to H.R. 5293✔ Yea
Key Vote 6: On Agreeing to the Amendment: Sanford Amendment to H.R. 5293
H. Amdt. 1194 offered by Rep. Mark Sanford (R-S.C.), to H.R. 5293, to the Department of Defense Appropriations Act 2017, would retain the U.S. military’s current practice of providing cash stipend to recruits, allowing them to pick the footwear of their personal preference. The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), passed by the House and Senate in May, changed current practice regarding footwear by including a “buy American” requirement, replacing the current cash allowance. This new language is a de facto earmark because it benefits one company: New Balance. The Department of Defense has concluded that the new language in the NDAA “would directly lead to a higher recruit injury rate at basic training,” The amendment would undo the New Balance provision, and halt an egregious example of crony capitalism that will cost taxpayers over $300 million and keeps this provision from coming into effect by not backing it.
"Yea" votes scored. - 7: On Agreeing to the Amendment: Massie Amendment to H.R. 5293✔ Yea
Key Vote 7: On Agreeing to the Amendment: Massie Amendment to H.R. 5293
H. Amdt. 1204 offered by Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY), to H.R. 5293, to the Department of Defense Appropriations Act 2017, protects the Fourth Amendment rights of Americans from unauthorized searches and seizures of property. The bill in its current form requires the National Security Agency and other intelligence agencies to follow due process and obtain a warrant to collect the communications of American citizens. Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) was written to only allow the government to collect the communications of foreigners, but a large quantity of American communications are bundled in during the process. By prohibiting backdoor spying, this measure represents a step forward in the battle to ensure privacy and security in the face of unconstitutional surveillance. The amendment also prohibits government agencies from requesting that U.S. companies build security vulnerabilities into their hardware or software in order to make it easier for the government to access them
"Yea" votes scored. - 8: On Agreeing to the Amendment: Buck Amendment to H.R. 5485✔ Yea
Key Vote 8: On Agreeing to the Amendment: Buck Amendment to H.R. 5485
H. Amdt. 1243 offered by Rep. Ken Buck (R-Colo.)) which “reduces the salary of the IRS Commissioner to $0 annually from date of enactment through January 20, 2017;”
"Yea" votes scored. - 9: On Agreeing to the Amendment: Gosar Amendment to H.R. 5485✔ Yea
Key Vote 9: On Agreeing to the Amendment: Gosar Amendment to H.R. 5485
H. Amdt. 1249 offered by Rep. Paul Gosar (R-Ariz.) which “prohibits funds the use of funds to pay a performance bonus to any senior IRS employee
"Yea" votes scored. - 10: On Agreeing to the Amendment: Duffy Amendment to H.R. 5485✔ Yea
Key Vote 10: On Agreeing to the Amendment: Duffy Amendment to H.R. 5485
H. Amdt. 1245 by Rep. Sean Duffy (R-Wis.) which “prohibits funds from being used to implement, administer, or enforce a new regulatory action of $100 million or more;”
"Yea" votes scored. - 11: On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass: H.R. 5606 - Anti-terrorism Information Sharing Is Strength Act✔ Nay
Key Vote 11: On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass: H.R. 5606 - Anti-terrorism Information Sharing Is Strength Act
The Anti-terrorism Information Sharing Is Strength Act expands Section 314 of the USA PATRIOT Act to a host of domestic crimes that have nothing to do with terrorism. The bill also surrenders more rulemaking authority to the Treasury Department at a time when the regulatory state is out of control.
"Nay" votes scored. - 12: On Passage: H.R. 4768 - Separation of Powers Restoration Act✔ Yea
Key Vote 12: On Passage: H.R. 4768 - Separation of Powers Restoration Act
This bill modifies the scope of judicial review of agency actions to authorize courts reviewing agency actions to decide de novo (without giving deference to the agency's interpretation) all relevant questions of law, including the interpretation of constitutional and statutory provisions, and rules made by agencies.
"Yea" votes scored. Double Score - 13: On Agreeing to the Amendment: Perry Amendment to H.R. 5538✔ Yea
Key Vote 13: On Agreeing to the Amendment: Perry Amendment to H.R. 5538
H. Amdt.1346 offered by Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.) which “reduces Appropriations made in this Act for the Environmental Protection Agency by 17 percent.” The cost of EPA’s Clean Power Plan to Pennsylvania consumers would be shifted back to the EPA under this statement
"Yea" votes scored. - 14: On Agreeing to the Amendment: Palmer Amendment to H.R. 5538✔ Yea
Key Vote 14: On Agreeing to the Amendment: Palmer Amendment to H.R. 5538
H. Amdt. 1342 offered by Rep. Gary Palmer (R-Ala.) which “ensures that none of the funds made available by this Act may be used for the Environmental Protection Agency’s Criminal Enforcement Division.” The cost and extent of the Environmental Protection Agency’s Criminal Enforcement Division are addressed by this amendment
"Yea" votes scored. - 15: On Agreeing to the Amendment: King Amendment to H.R. 5538✔ Yea
Key Vote 15: On Agreeing to the Amendment: King Amendment to H.R. 5538
H. Amdt. 1330 offered by Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) which “ensures that no funds appropriated by this Act can be used to implement, administer, or enforce Davis-Bacon prevailing rate wage requirements.”
"Yea" votes scored. - 16: On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass: H.R. 5523 - Clyde-Hirsch-Sowers RESPECT Act✔ Yea
Key Vote 16: On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass: H.R. 5523 - Clyde-Hirsch-Sowers RESPECT Act
In March 2015, the DOJ restricted the use of civil asset forfeiture in cases where structuring -- in which a bank account holder makes frequent deposits below $10,000 -- is the only offense suspected. Civil asset forfeiture is a pernicious form of government overreach by which federal agencies can seize cash or property without ever arresting, charging or prosecuting someone of a crime. The Clyde-Hirsch-Sowers RESPECT Act codified this administrative change.
"Yea" votes scored. - 17: On Agreeing to the Senate Amendment: H.R. 5325 - Continuing Resolution to December 9, 2016✔ Nay
Key Vote 17: On Agreeing to the Senate Amendment: H.R. 5325 - Continuing Resolution to December 9, 2016
The continuing resolution through December 9, 2016 triggers a lame duck session of Congress, which is designed to bolster the failed Beltway practice of legislating at the expense of the American taxpayers instead of for them. The CR will continue this pattern of irresponsible spending by forcing a new spending measure to be considered in a lame duck when the current session of Congress is wrapping up and members are at their least accountable.
"Nay" votes scored. - 18: On Motion to Refer: H.Res. 828 -- Impeachment Resolution Against IRS Commissioner John Koskinen ✔ Nay
Key Vote 18: On Motion to Refer: H.Res. 828 -- Impeachment Resolution Against IRS Commissioner John Koskinen
The motion to refer was a procedural move made by Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) to block H.Res. 828 from consideration on the floor of the House. The motion sent the resolution to the House Judiciary Committee, effectively killing it in the 114th Congress. In September, FreedomWorks reserved the right to key vote against any motion that would prevent the resolution consideration. The commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is appointed to a five-year term. John Koskinen took office in December 2013, meaning that he could, theoretically, continue to hold his current post in the next administration.
"Nay" votes scored. - 19: On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass: H.R. 4919 - Kevin and Avonte's Law✔ Nay
Key Vote 19: On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass: H.R. 4919 - Kevin and Avonte's Law
While this bill may have good intentions, there should not be federal intervention. The bill does not properly limit the rulemaking authority of the DOJ, and rather, opens shortens the amount of time available to examine and debate the content. “Federal standards must respect the ‘civil rights and liberties’ of people being tracked, including their Fourth Amendment rights. Data collected must be used ‘solely for the purpose of preventing injury or death.’” We cannot risk civil liberties or allow our privacies to be ignored.
"Nay" votes scored. - No votes for this year match the provided filters.
- View scorecard »
2015: 114th Congress 100%
- 1: On Passage: H.R. 596 - To Fully Repeal ObamaCare ✔ Yea
Key Vote 1: On Passage: H.R. 596 - To Fully Repeal ObamaCare
This bill fully repeals all of ObamaCare and also directs the relevant House committees to draft a patient-centered health care reform proposal to replace it. ObamaCare has failed to either make health insurance more affordable or to improve access or quality of care, and must be repealed in order to enact real reforms to accomplish those goals.
"Yea" votes scored. - 2: On the Amendment: H.Amdt. 72 to H.R. 749 - To End Federal Amtrak Subsidies✔ Yea
Key Vote 2: On the Amendment: H.Amdt. 72 to H.R. 749 - To End Federal Amtrak Subsidies
This amendment by Rep. Tom McClintock would completely end the federal subsidies for Amtrak. In spite of billions of dollars in taxpayer subsidies, Amtrak has continued to run an inefficient service that racks up massive annual losses, and should not continue being propped up by the government.
"Yea" votes scored. - 3: On Passage: H.R. 1105 - Death Tax Repeal Act✔ Yea
Key Vote 3: On Passage: H.R. 1105 - Death Tax Repeal Act
This bill would fully repeal the federal estate tax, better known to most as the "death tax". Not only does the death tax represent double (or more) taxation of an individual's property and belongings, it can also destroy individually owned family farms and small businesses.
"Yea" votes scored. - 4: On Passage: H.R. 1560 - Protecting Cyber Networks Act✔ Nay
Key Vote 4: On Passage: H.R. 1560 - Protecting Cyber Networks Act
While this bill is intended to make information sharing on cyber threats easier, it also sacrifices many privacy protections in the process. The bill fails to ensure that companies and government agencies are not sharing personally identifiable information when they report cyber attacks. Worse, the bill requires that cyber threat information be shared with the NSA. Although well-intentioned, the privacy loopholes in this bill turn in from a "cybersecurity" bill to a "cybersurveillance" bill.
"Nay" votes scored. - 5: On the Amendment: H.Amdt. 172 to H.R. 2028: To Reduce Spending in Energy and Water by $2.95 Billion✔ Yea
Key Vote 5: On the Amendment: H.Amdt. 172 to H.R. 2028: To Reduce Spending in Energy and Water by $2.95 Billion
This amendment by Rep. Tom McClintock would eliminate the Department of Energy funding for the Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy and Fossil Energy programs, and would sharply reduce funding for nuclear energy programs. Removing these market-distorting subsidies would save nearly $3 billion.
"Yea" votes scored. - 6: On the Amendment: H.Amdt. 503 to H.R. 2685 - To Limit Surveillance of U.S. Citizens Under Section 702 of FISA✔ Yea
Key Vote 6: On the Amendment: H.Amdt. 503 to H.R. 2685 - To Limit Surveillance of U.S. Citizens Under Section 702 of FISA
Currently, the NSA and FBI can access the electronic communications of U.S. citizens collected without a specific warrant under section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. This amendment by Reps. Massie and Lofgren would defund those activities. It would also prevent the NSA from requesting that security vulnerabilities be built into private products.
"Yea" votes scored. - 7: On Passage: H.R. 2042 - Ratepayer Protection Act of 2015✔ Yea
Key Vote 7: On Passage: H.R. 2042 - Ratepayer Protection Act of 2015
This bill would delay the EPA from implementing their economically devastating new greenhouse gas emissions rule for existing power plants. If implemented, this rule would cause many coal-fired power plants to shut down, dramatically increasing energy costs for millions of Americans.
"Yea" votes scored. - 8: On the Amendment: H.Amdt. 53 to H.R. 5 - To prevent the Secretary of Education from using grants or waivers to coerce states into adopting or keeping Common Core or other national standards.✔ Yea
Key Vote 8: On the Amendment: H.Amdt. 53 to H.R. 5 - To prevent the Secretary of Education from using grants or waivers to coerce states into adopting or keeping Common Core or other national standards.
This amendment by Rep. Zeldin would greatly strengthen current prohibitions against coercing states to adopt national educational standards. Specifically, it prohibits the Secretary of Education from conditioning any grant money or waivers upon states keeping Common Core or any other specific national curriculum standards.
"Yea" votes scored. - 9: On the Amendment: H.Amdt. 64 to H.R. 5 - To establish grants for early childhood education programs in the states✔ Nay
Key Vote 9: On the Amendment: H.Amdt. 64 to H.R. 5 - To establish grants for early childhood education programs in the states
This amendment by Rep. Polis (introduced for Rep. Meng) would establish grants to entice states to subsidize early childhood education (Head Start) programs. This would entail an effective federalization of pre-K education at taxpayer expense. Not only does the federal government have no place centralizing yet another aspect of education, repeated studies have shown that Head Start and similar pre-K education programs are ineffective.
"Nay" votes scored. - 10: On the Amendment: H.Amdt. 656 to H.R. 6 - To ensure that new spending under H.R. 6 counts as normal spending that counts towards the budget caps✔ Yea
Key Vote 10: On the Amendment: H.Amdt. 656 to H.R. 6 - To ensure that new spending under H.R. 6 counts as normal spending that counts towards the budget caps
As written, H.R. 6 would create nearly $2 billion per year in new mandatory spending (not subject to budget caps). This amendment by Rep. Brat would force Congress to account for the new spending under the Budget Control Act caps and therefore to find equivalent cuts elsewhere.
"Yea" votes scored. - 11: On Passage: H.R. 427 - Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny (REINS) Act✔ Yea
Key Vote 11: On Passage: H.R. 427 - Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny (REINS) Act
This bill, entitled the “REINS Act”, would require a vote in Congress on any “major” regulation (over $100 million in economic impact) issued by the executive branch before it could be enforced on the American people. The REINS Act would thus restore much of Congress' lawmaking authority that it has ceded to the executive branch over the past century.
"Yea" votes scored. - 12: Discharge Petition to Bring a Reauthorization of the U.S. Export-Import Bank Directly to the House Floor☐ Did Not Vote
Key Vote 12: Discharge Petition to Bring a Reauthorization of the U.S. Export-Import Bank Directly to the House Floor
In an uncommon move, 218 Members of the House of Representatives signed a discharge petition regarding H.R. 597 - a bill to reauthorize the Export-Import Bank of the United States. This successful petition bypasses the House Committee on Finance, in which the bill had been stalled, bringing the bill straight to the House floor. The Export-Import bank serves as a taxpayer-backed conduit for corporate welfare, and should be left expired. Only signers of the petition are scored for this vote.
"Nay" votes scored. - 13: On the Amendment: H.Admt. 713 to H.R. 702 - To remove additional Maritime Security Fleet funding✔ Yea
Key Vote 13: On the Amendment: H.Admt. 713 to H.R. 702 - To remove additional Maritime Security Fleet funding
This amendment by Rep. Justin Amash would remove the section of the bill that would provide $500 million in new spending for the Maritime Security Fleet program. This new spending, while a relatively small amount was quietly added into the bill without any vote, ignoring the amendment and committee process. This spending represents a shallow attempt to court a narrow special interest group to gain votes for the bill - essentially violating the House ban on earmarks.
"Yea" votes scored. - 14: On Passage: H.R. 597 - Reform Exports and Expand the American Economy Act (Ex-Im Re-Authorization)✔ Nay
Key Vote 14: On Passage: H.R. 597 - Reform Exports and Expand the American Economy Act (Ex-Im Re-Authorization)
This bill would reauthorize the U.S. Export-Import Bank through 2019. The Ex-Im Bank's loans and guarantees distort trade markets, and mostly flow to a small number of immense, politically connected corporations. Congress allowed the Ex-Im Bank's charter to expire in June, and this 80-year-old corporate welfare program should stay closed.
"Nay" votes scored. - 15: On Motion that the House Concur in the Senate Amendment with an Amendment: H.R. 1314 - Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015✔ Nay
Key Vote 15: On Motion that the House Concur in the Senate Amendment with an Amendment: H.R. 1314 - Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015
This bill was the vehicle for the budget agreement that will spend $80 billion beyond the Budget Control Act caps over two years, along with $16 billion in new defense spending that doesn't count towards the caps. The supposed offsets to this spending are mostly either gimmicks or long-term, while the new deficit spending is immediate. The bill also suspends the debt ceiling through March of 2017, effectively giving the government a blank check for that period.
"Nay" votes scored. Double Score - 16: On the Amendment: H.Amdt. 787 to H.R. 22 - To prevent funds in this act from being used to enforce Davis-Bacon wage controls✔ Yea
Key Vote 16: On the Amendment: H.Amdt. 787 to H.R. 22 - To prevent funds in this act from being used to enforce Davis-Bacon wage controls
This amendment by Rep. Steve King would effectively prevent Davis-Bacon wage controls from applying to the infrastructure projects funded by this highway funding bill. These onerous wage requirement were designed to shut out competition with unions for federal contracts, and end up costing taxpayers huge sums of money.
"Yea" votes scored. - 17: On Passage: S.J.Res. 24 - Disapproving of the EPA Rule to Increase Emissions Standards for Existing Power Plants✔ Yea
Key Vote 17: On Passage: S.J.Res. 24 - Disapproving of the EPA Rule to Increase Emissions Standards for Existing Power Plants
This resolution invokes the Congressional Act to disapprove of the recent EPA rule that greatly increases emissions restrictions on existing coal-fired power plants. This tremendously destructive regulation would greatly increase energy costs in the many states which rely heavily upon coal-fired power plants for their electricity. These cost increases damage overall economic growth, and in particular lower the standard of living of lower-income earners.
"Yea" votes scored. - 18: On Passage: S.J.Res 23 - Disapproving of the EPA Rule to Increase Emissions Standards for New Power Plants✔ Yea
Key Vote 18: On Passage: S.J.Res 23 - Disapproving of the EPA Rule to Increase Emissions Standards for New Power Plants
This resolution invokes the Congressional Act to disapprove of the recent EPA rule that greatly increases emissions restrictions on any future coal-fired power plants. This rule tightens emissions standards to the point where it will likely not be economically feasible to build new coal-fired electric plants, crippling one of the most abundant and cost-effective sources of energy in America.
"Yea" votes scored. - 19: On the Amendment: H.Amdt. 861 to H.R. 8 - To Lift the Ban on U.S. Crude Oil Exports✔ Yea
Key Vote 19: On the Amendment: H.Amdt. 861 to H.R. 8 - To Lift the Ban on U.S. Crude Oil Exports
This amendment by Rep. Joe Barton would finally lift the decades-old ban on exporting U.S. crude oil. This would allow the U.S. to take better advantage of our recent major surge in oil production, creating thousands of new jobs and boosting economic growth in the process.
"Yea" votes scored. - 20: On the Conference Report: H.R. 22 - Highway Funding Bill & Ex-Im Reauthorization✔ Nay
Key Vote 20: On the Conference Report: H.R. 22 - Highway Funding Bill & Ex-Im Reauthorization
This bill would renew federal highway funding to states for a period of five years. However, it does not solve the structural deficit within the Highway Trust Fund, doesn't eliminate the wasteful spending that takes away from funding roads, and doesn't offset that spending in any real way. Furthermore, this bill contains a reauthorization of the expired Export-Import Bank, in order to prevent having a standalone vote on renewing such a direct corporate welfare fund.
"Nay" votes scored. - 21: On Passage: H.R. 2029 - Consolidated Appropriations Act (Omnibus)✔ Nay
Key Vote 21: On Passage: H.R. 2029 - Consolidated Appropriations Act (Omnibus)
This omnibus appropriations bills for Fiscal Year 2016 funds former Speaker Boehner's budget-busting deal to the tune of $50 billion above the budget caps for 2016. It contains several very troubling legislative riders a well, including more funding for the IMF, and a massive new cybersecurity information sharing program that violates consumers' privacy and due process. It also fails to include most of the amendments from the appropriations process that would have defunded key, harmful federal regulations.
"Nay" votes scored. - No votes for this year match the provided filters.
- View scorecard »